Rogerio Brito wrote: > > Dear community, > > I've noticed that there are some programs in testing that I'd > like to use (and at least one that I have to use), but I'm > very scared of it not working correctly or breaking badly > when, say, I'd need to get something done fast. > > So, I'd like to ask you: how stable is "testing" compared to > potato? > > Thank you very much for your comments, Roger...
I love the new testing distribution. I've been running Woody for about a year, and the fact that there's a testing distribution made that a much easier choice for me. All pieces that enter testing must first prove that they have no hideous bugs in unstable, then are committed. I like it. -- -=|JP|=- "Why, oh, why didn't I take the blue pill?" Jon Pennington | Atipa Linux Solutions -o) [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://www.atipa.com /\\ Kansas City, MO, USA | 816-595-3000 x1550 _\_V 6D04 39E0 CAE9 9ADA 2CA3 2EBE 898A 6C37 CA1E A29C
