Russell Coker wrote: > > On Sunday 07 January 2001 05:20, Tibor D. wrote: > > Russell Coker wrote: > > > On Saturday 06 January 2001 21:19, Tibor D. wrote: > > >> Could you imagin squid.conf without any comments and example-lines? The > > > > > > Incidentally I have recently submitted a proposal for debconf'ing Squid. > > > I've forward it to debian-user a few minutes ago. > > > > As I mentioned above, I'd really like to have a fast way to setup squid > > or lilo (with some menu-system), but I'd like to have the possibility to > > update the original conffiles by hand (and to know that these lines > > won't just disappear when installing an update). > > Today I had to update /etc/inetd.conf and to activate swat (its for > > samba) and there I saw already the line: #<off># swat ....... > > There I found that these lines can be changed by the "update-inetd"-tool. > > I think something like that would be cool, so one can insert own lines, > > but some tool can also handle those labeled-lines (and only those). So > > the config-files remain transparent. > > I think it's not the idea of debconf, to really have all possible > > variables of lilo.conf/squid.conf changed, but only the "most wanted" > > for a fast setup. > > In the next version there is a debconf option for whether you want to > overwrite an existing lilo.conf file with a generated file. > Also I have added a "-f" option to liloconfig to force the creation of a new > file, so you could create a new file when you want with "liloconfig -f", also > I've made liloconfig take a parameter of the file to create, so you could do > "liloconfig /tmp/lilo.conf" to see what it suggests (and then do what you > like with the output). >
Hi Since this thread is CC'ed to debian-user,is it a known fact that message=/boot/graphic_screen doesn't work with the new lilo or is it a bug I should report ?For now I installed the storm's version of lilo and holded the official lilo(1:21.6-2).
