on Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 10:05:35AM -0500, Bob Bernstein ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > On Sat, Dec 30, 2000 at 03:00:11AM -0800, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote: > > > Actually, it doesn't. Same error: > > > > Symbol's function definition is void: set-process-coding-system > > Eeek. Fwiw, here's what I have here, that seems to work with no errors: > > w3-el-e20 4.0pre.46-9 running in > emacs20 20.7-3 > > from unstable.
Ok, several problems I had. I've installed emacs20-dl and w3-el-e20. Software works better when it's there. > > ..and, IMVAO, w3's rendering is less than ideal. > > I use it to view URLs when I'm using gnus for mail, and I don't do that in > X. So I hafta beg out of that one. Hmmm.... Looking at things, I'm still trying to figure out if w3 and w3m are the same thing, just in and out of emacs dress. I was getting really convinced they were, now I'm pretty convinced they're not. If I haven't mentioned it recently, I *really* like w3m, even when I am in X. There's a lot to be said for a text-mode browser with uniform presentation across sites with very badly fscked HTML. Ok. Up and running now. Any hints as to what the various "W3 Style Face #####" correspond to? I'm doing a sort of hunt-and-peck right now trying to figure out what sort of markup they correspond to. -- Karsten M. Self <kmself@ix.netcom.com> http://kmself.home.netcom.com/ Evangelist, Zelerate, Inc. http://www.zelerate.org What part of "Gestalt" don't you understand? There is no K5 cabal http://gestalt-system.sourceforge.net/ http://www.kuro5hin.org
pgpowVviTSi3L.pgp
Description: PGP signature
