Yes you (Gary) are right the problem happens cosistently with some cd's but far 
infrequently with others. What catches my intrest is that this did not occur 
with Red Hat . Are the cdrom drivers different between the two dristibutions ? 
From dmesg I notice that Debian used "Uniform CD driver revision 3.11" I don't 
remember if 
Red Hat used a different one. I had thought that CD-ROM support was built into 
the kernel itself. In any case I wonder if it would be possible to use red hat 
drivers with debian. Though I am begining to love Debian for its size, 
do-it-yourself philosophy and the co-operative user base, the red hat driver 
was certainly better in that I was able to read some defective cd's too, that I 
just can't mount in debian.
sincerely 
balbir thomas

On Fri, Dec 22, 2000 at 08:48:00PM -0500, Gary Mulder wrote:
> 
> Most Pentium based systems have two EIDE buses. Normally if you have one hard
> drive and one CDROM drive you'll have each as the master device on each bus.
> This would result in the devices /dev/hda and /dev/hdc. 
> 
> This is optimal as the EIDE protocol only allows one device at a time to be
> active on each EIDE bus and CDROM I/O operations are very slow. If a second 
> hard
> drive and / or CDROM are installed they should be configured each as slave
> devices on the bus with the other like device. They would then show up as
> /dev/hdb (EIDE channel 1) and /dev/hdd (EIDE channel 2).
> 
> On the original topic - does it consistentely occur with only some CDs or any
> CD? Some CDROM drives / ATAPI drivers have problems reading some CDROMS,
> especially "extra capacity" (also known something like 700MB) CDs. Results can
> be very inconsistent between drives, drivers and CDs. If it *is* consistent 
> and
> you're using the same ATAPI driver as you were using under Redhat (not sure 
> how
> you'd check...) I'd guess the CDROM drive is going bad.
> 
> Gary
> 
> Balbir Thomas wrote:
> 
> > Correct me if I am wrong . The CDROM is a slave to the primary IDE drive so 
> > I would expect it would be hdb.
> > 
> > sincerely
> > Balbir
> 

Reply via email to