How about just using dvipdf if you don't need all those fancy pdf features?
Shao.
Thomas Halahan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> Joerg,
>
> I use 2 ways
>
> 1) The ps route is good if you have lots of ps figures.
>
> > pslatex filename.tex
> > dvips filename -o
> > ps2pdf filename.ps
>
> the pslatex embeds the fonts for you, it is like using
> \usepackage{times}. the ps2pdf results are better this way. you can
> then also use the psfrag package for example (which works with dvips).
>
>
> OR..
>
> 2) only refer to your images without the extension.
>
> \includegraphics{filename}
>
> then convert all your images to pdf using the "eps2pdf" perl script
> (came with potato).
>
> > eps2pdf *.ps
>
> now run pdflatex and your graphics will be included.
>
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> Tom
>
>
> On 13 11:12 am, Joerg Johannes wrote:
> > To all pdflatex-users
> >
> > I tried to convert my .tex-files to pdf with the pdflatex-command.
> > This works great for text-only documents. It seems that pdflatex
> > cannot include pictures (they are ok., latex --> xdvi shows
> > them...). Do I have to include them in a special format (I tried
> > .bmp, .png, .ps as input; latex --> dvi makes it all, but pdflatex
> > just leaves space...) How can I do this?
> >
> > thanks
> >
> > joerg
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
--
____________________________________________________________________________
Shao Zhang - Running Debian 2.1 ___ _ _____
Department of Communications / __| |_ __ _ ___ |_ / |_ __ _ _ _ __ _
University of New South Wales \__ \ ' \/ _` / _ \ / /| ' \/ _` | ' \/ _` |
Sydney, Australia |___/_||_\__,_\___/ /___|_||_\__,_|_||_\__, |
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] |___/
_____________________________________________________________________________
