On Sat, Dec 09, 2000 at 03:39:44AM -0500, S . Salman Ahmed wrote:
> I just installed potato using the 2.2r2 boot floppies. The problem I am
> having is that the output of 'du' and 'df' does not agree. Specifically,
> even though I created a 2.5Gb /usr/local/ partition on which I haven't
> currently installed any SW, here is what df says about it:

This has come up before.  I forget the full explanation, but if I
remember correctly, df is closer to the truth.  The info page linking to
"du" says "Estimate file space usage", though there is no further
mention of why it is an "estimate" in the actual "du" page.

[snip...]

> Partition info is as follows:
> 
> # /etc/fstab: static file system information.
> #
> # <file system>       <mount point>   <type>  <options>                       
> <dump>  <pass>
> /dev/hdc1     /               ext2    defaults,errors=remount-ro      0       
> 1
> /dev/hdc5     none            swap    sw,pri=3                        0       > 0
> /dev/hdc6     none            swap    sw,pri=3                        0       > 0
> proc          /proc           proc    defaults                        0       > 0
> /dev/fd0      /floppy         auto    defaults,user,noauto            0       > 0
> /dev/cdrom    /cdrom          iso9660 defaults,ro,user,noauto         0       > 0
> /dev/hdc7     /tmp            ext2    rw                              0       
> 2
> /dev/hdc8     /home           ext2    rw                              0       
> 2
> /dev/hdc9     /usr/local      ext2    rw                              0       
> 2
> /dev/hdc10    /var            ext2    rw                              0       
> 2
> /dev/hdc11    /usr            ext2    rw                              0       
> 2
> /dev/hdc3     /backup         ext2    rw                              0       
> 2

Put the /usr/local entry, after /usr.  /usr is getting mounted on top of
your /usr/local partition, hence the identical values.  I think I'd also
mount /home somewhere near the last entry.  Linux is kinda funny about
allowing a partition to be mounted more than once (reportedly a feature,
rather than a bug). 

-- 
Eric G. Miller <egm2@jps.net>

Reply via email to