"Jonathan Gift" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >I've been using apt-get to do my installs, taking its suggestions for >additional dependencies, but have run into a few problems of late and was >wondering if dselect was more thorough? Or is there no difference as far as >what is checked installed?
They are equally as reliable, but check different things. dselect will prompt you about Suggests:, and be quite insistent about Recommends:. apt-get will ignore Suggests:, and I can't remember how it deals with Recommends:. When I'm not familiar with the recommendations and suggestions made by a package, I tend to use dselect instead, as that way I at least get told about everything relevant. -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED]