On Tue, 31 Oct 2000, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote: > > Current practice seems to have strayed a bit from the concept of only > > having statically linked binaries in the sbin directories. You may find > > shell scripts, perl, python, all kinds of stuff. I think these days a > > lot of people tend to think the 's' stands for system or sysadmin or some > > such. And you may find things in there that don't even relate to system > > administration. > > as someone else pointed out, FHS declares sbin to mean system bin. I know > the musty UNIX history, we are talking current practice here (-:
Exactly where I was going with my final sentence. :} -- Bud Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
