see below Erdmut Pfeifer wrote: > > On Wed, Oct 18, 2000 at 11:08:23AM +0200, Daniel Reuter wrote: > > Hello there, > > > > Thanks to all, who responded up to now. I think I'll give some more > > information, as I still don't understand, why the warning > > main.c:158: assignment makes pointer from integer without a cast > > is generated in my case: > > > > I have the following (among some other function and structure > > declarations) in my program-header-file 'bet.h': > > > > #include <stdlib.h> > > #include <stdio.h> > > > > struct provided_data{ > > double sample_weight; > > struct datapoint *ppovolads; > > int value_count; > > }; > > > > struct provided_data *read_data(char *); > > > > > > This function is in file 'scanner.c' and does the following: > > > > #include "bet.h" > > > > struct provided_data *read_data(char *input_file_name) > > { > > struct provided_data *prov_data_buffer; > > > > Read in some data and put them into structure provided_data. > > Then return pointer to structure provided data using the > > following statement: > > > > return(prov_data_buffer); > > } > > > > > > In file main.c I have the following: > > > > #include "bet.h" > > > > int main(int argc, char **argv) > > { > > some code that reads commandline opts and so on. > > > > Here I define input_data: > > struct provided_data *input_data; > > > > Now call read_data: > > ---> input_data=read_data(input_file_name);
try: input_data=(struct provided_data *)read_data(input_file_name); then try: input_data=read_data((char *)input_file_name); and finally: input_data=(struct provided_data *)read_data((char*)input_file_name); to figure out which one is the offending integer - it is either return value (no warning when first line used) or parameter (second line) or both (third line)... [of course, you can use all three lines at once, no need to edit/compile for each of them] are you sure that the struct provided_data is known? try to simplify the code fragment and compile it alone... [without the rest of you app] erik > > } > > > > line marked with ---> is the line, the compiler complains about. > > I don't quite understand this, because I never declared function read_data > > to return an int. Is something wrong with my function declaration? > > sorry, I can't tell you what the problem is -- doesn't seem to be > in the syntax. My gcc (egcs-2.91.66) doesn't have any problems with > this code fragment. > > -- > Erdmut Pfeifer > science+computing gmbh > > -- Bugs come in through open windows. Keep Windows shut! -- > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null