Hello! Hmm, I actually have never upgraded using apt, but manually from 2.1 to 2.2. No problems (almost). But I can tell you debian is very well-known for that a install is only needed "one time in a computer life" and then you can always upgrade without problems. At least since apt came out.
Kind Regards, Stephan Hachinger ----- Original Message ----- From: "Ariel Manzur" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Thomas J. Hamman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <debian-user@lists.debian.org> Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2000 9:59 PM Subject: Re: Debian vs. Red Hat > At 23:42 04/09/2000 -0400, Thomas J. Hamman wrote: > >On Mon, Sep 04, 2000 at 09:54:15PM -0500, Wayne Sitton wrote: > >> Here is the situation, I'm a Debian user. The company I work for, so far, > >> will only allow Red Hat as it's Linux OS on it's servers. I need some good > >> reasons to justify using Debian. So I'm asking you guys to help me out with > >> your opinions, and Documentation, to prove to these computer iliterate > >> people, that Debian is better. > > > >How about the fact that it's more stable and doesn't need to be > >reinstalled every time there's a new version? > > I had to reinstall my debian last time a new version came out.. > > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null >
