Yes it is and AT keyboard, and there is no problem with BIOS as far as I understand, because it starts to load the kernel. If a keyboard must be present, does any one know who to make a "plug" to make the computer think that there is a keyboard attached?
Thank you Lazar On Sat, 2 Sep 2000, Philip C Mendelsohn wrote: > Is this an AT style keyboard? I found that some if not all older AT > keyboards need to be present for the system to complete the BIOS boot seq. > > Hope that helps. > Phil Mendelsohn > > On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Lazar Fleysher wrote: > > > It stops after "Console: colour VGA+ 80x25"... basically the first boot > > message.. > > > > On Fri, 1 Sep 2000, Nate Amsden wrote: > > > > > where does the system stop booting ? i have many machines without a > > > keyboard running they run fine. i read that linux 2.4 is including new > > > code to enable systems withouyt keyboards to boot..probably a kernel > > > workaround for what the bios should handle on it's own(and does handle > > > on the vast majority of boards made in the past 5 years) > > > > > > nate > > > > > > Lazar Fleysher wrote: > > > > > > > > HI > > > > > > > > I would like to operate a machine without a keyboard (in server mode) > > > > The keyboard is disabled in bios, but the system does not boot without > > > > it. > > > > Should I compile the kernel in a special way?
