let's not get into that debate again... Some people prefer commenting after a post, some prefer doing it before the original text. Personally, I think the latter is better (the original will already be read by most readers), but the former can be useful (when offering comments to different parts of a post, e.g.). Also, different clients have different defaults ;)
Jeroen T. Wenting [EMAIL PROTECTED] Murphy was wrong, things that can't go wrong will anyway > -----Original Message----- > From: Keith G. Murphy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, September 01, 2000 16:21 > To: debian-user@lists.debian.org > Subject: Re: PPP not going > > > In your server end's options file you should do something like > > <xxx.yyy.zzz.aaa>:<bbb.ccc.ddd.eee> > > And in the client's you can have: > > ipcp-accept-local > ipcp-accept-remote > > You can read about this stuff in 'man pppd'. There are other > combinations you can use as well. > > By the way, don't do jeopardy-style posting, answering at the top, like > I did just here. It makes a mess when Christoph has answered *after* > your post, then you insist on answering *before* his. I just did it > here to try to keep it slightly readable. > > <snap> </snap>
