On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 09:18:11PM -0700, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 07:50:33PM -0600, s. keeling wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 03:12:13PM -0700, kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote:
> > > On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 12:52:27AM -0300, Rogerio Brito wrote:
>
> > Agreed wrt the amount of RAM he has installed. However, my AMD
> > 486DX4-100 with SCSI and 96 Mb RAM and a four Mb Matrox is a very
> > snappy machine. I get better performance on it than I did recently
> > with a Sun Ultra 1.
> >
> > SCSI will leave you with more cpu cycles. RAM tends to help more than
> > upgrading to a faster processor would.
>
> What's a typical process load? Programs/top output?
It's a desktop X Window workstation, not a server.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephen) TopQuark Software & Serv. Enquire within.
[sed 's/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/@/g'] Contract programmer, server
bum.
Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
