Tony <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: |> Yes, I basically agree with that, but getting the document into |> html as well as ps I have found to be a bore. Last time I tried |> latex2html on a 100,000 word tex document, it died miserably. Are |> there better alternatives for producing html from complex latex |> sources?
I haven't used it a great deal, but the hyperlatex package seems to do (something like) this reasonably well. >From the README in the doc directory: This is version 2.3 of the Hyperlatex package. Hyperlatex allows you to use a LaTeX-like language to prepare documents in HTML (the hypertext markup language used by the world wide web), and, at the same time, to produce a fine printed document from your input. You can use all of LaTeX's power for the printed output, and you don't have to learn a new language for creating hypertext documents. Note that Hyperlatex is not meant to translate arbitrary Latex files into Html. Rather, it provides an authoring environment for writing printed documents and Html documents at the same time, using an extended subset of Latex (excluding concepts that have no Html counterpart and adding commands for new Html concepts such as hyperlinks or included images). Hyperlatex is a package available both in slink and in frozen, Jim