I can't really see what's happening with this information, could you answer the following questions?
How far does a traceroute come? What are the route-tables (specially the one where traceroute stops) ? Ron Rademaker On Mon, 5 Jun 2000, behapy wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to ask about something below. Would please tell me the > answer? > > > 81.200.1.2 ----- 81.200.1.1 ----- > 210.xx.xx.xx ----- to the internet > . 81.200.2.1 > (something firewall) > internet . > . > . > 81.200.2.200 > (PCs) (routers) > (internet gateway) > > > > > 51.202.3.250 > > . > > . > > . > +------------------ > 51.202.3.2 (servers) > | > | > 51.200.1.2 ----- 51.200.1.1 ----------- > 49.100.1.1 ----- 49.100.1.2 > . 51.200.2.1 > 49.100.2.1 . > LAN . > 51.202.3.1 . > > . . > . > > 51.200.5.200 > 49.100.2.200 > (PCs) (routers) > (routers) (servers) > > I've 2 NICs. eth0 81.200.1.200(gw81.200.1.1, mask 255.255.255.0) and > eth1 51.200.1.251(no gateway, mask 255.0.0.0). So I can login to > 51.202.3.2 by telnet. And I can also login to ftp.kde.org by an ftp > program. > > But if I login to 49.100.2.200, I can not connect to the server. > Because the server 49.100.2.200 is not the same network address to my > eth1. So I changed eth1 as 51.200.1.251(gw51.200.1.1, mask > 255.255.255.0) and it is not worked. I don't know why. > > If I login to 49.100.2.200 then, eth0 will send packets to its gateway > 81.200.1.1 and eth1 also will send packets to its gateway 51.200.1.1 > then eth0 will reply something timeout or response if there is > 49.100.2.200 on the internet. Anyhow eth1 absoultly receive the > response from 49.100.2.200 I think. 51.200.1.251 -> request is not its > network address. SO -> 51.200.1.1 -> 49.100.2.1 (something?) -> > 49.100.2.200 ??? Am I wrong? > > the PC eth0 and eth1 have is win95 and 49.100.2.200 is linux. Is there > any solution to solve the problem? > > many many thanks to the responsers, > > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null >
