Ok scrap that idea. That's what I get for posting without thinking. Plan (b), note I might be entirely wrong again, is that installing the .deb for 2.0.33 is a rather bad idea, you should be compiling the support in using the 2.0.38 kernel source. I would have thought that NTFS support would be an option inside make menuconfig (or whatever make method you use), and by installing the 2.0.33 version you've effectively downgraded the NTFS support. Note again that it's so long since I played with Hamm that I could be wrong. Point I'm making is, you should be looking for a ntfs2.0.38* deb package or a module option within the 2.0.38 source for your NTFS support. Being a potato user I can't advise any further.
If I am wrong again, I will effectively quarantine my support services until my braincells reach an acceptably high number. Cheers, Corey Popelier http://members.dingoblue.net.au/~pancreas Work Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Mon, 1 May 2000, Corey Popelier wrote: > I would suggest going to http://archive.debian.org/debian-archive/dists > and look for a ntfs2.0.38*.deb somewhere in the hamm section there, > possibly under binary-i386/main. > > I am trying to verify this myself, but my netlink from work sucks ass. > > Cheers, > Corey Popelier > http://members.dingoblue.net.au/~pancreas > Work Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Mon, 1 May 2000, maths wrote: > > > hello everybody > > > > i want to mount ntfs, so i install ntfs2.0.33_971218-4.deb, > > i use > > > > # insmod -f ntfs.o > > > > and it tell me this ntfs.o is for kernel 2.0.33, and im using > > kernel 2.0.38 > > > > what shall i do? > > > > many thanks! > > ************************************************************** > > zhang xiaolei > > Department of mathematics > > GuangZhou Normal University > > mailto: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ************************************************************** > > > > > > -- > > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null > > > > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null >
