Damon Muller wrote: > > Quoth Brooks R. Robinson, > > I am looking at changing an in-house e-mail system from an ugly > > combination of outsourced collection/forwarding and JSMail on an > > NT server to linux. We have an ADSL line coming in, and I can > > handle all of the DNS and network stuff through the firewall, > > but I drop the ball at mail. We have about 100 clients using > > Microsoft Outlook, but our legacy address format is > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] I can't change the address format, and > > I'd like to leave POP3 in place. Which MTA is the best given my > > limitation? > > You might find that qmail and vpopmail might do the trick. qmail is > secure enough to have running on a firewall machine, and easy enough to > set up. The only problem is it isn't (DFSG) free (but it is free beer > free). vpopmail is GPL'd, and allows you to have virtual users, which do > not need local machine accounts. It also has a nice HTML interface, and > there is an imap server (courier-imap) which works well with it. > > qmail is packaged (a source package) in non-free, and vpopmail can be > found at http://www.inter7.com/vpopmail (I think).
Postfix is also very secure. And in my opinion, much easier to configure than qmail. And before anyone bashes me, I ran qmail for a couple of years with multiple virtual domains, and postfix is a lot easier to configure. jpb -- Joe Block <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CREOL System Administrator Social graces are the packet headers of everyday life.
