On Sun, 19 Mar 2000, Hans wrote:
> I've been comparing (not)lame313 and bladeenc today and (not)lame does > sound equally good at 128 compared to bladeenc at 256 bitrate. I use The > Who's 'Won't Get Fooled Again' for comparison, if you wonder. > > What I can't get done with (not)lame is batch jobs. Bladeenc simply names > the mp3 after the original file, changing wav to mp3. You can type > $bladeenc *.wav and all the wav files in the directory get encoded. How can > you do this with (not)lame, as it requires both input and output name? --hans > > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null > I'm using cdenc ----- snip ------- #!/usr/bin/perl # # Creation of whole mp3 Suite of one CD # # Version 0.3.5 of 06.07.1999 by Stephan Skrodzki # ---- snip --------- with little changes with lame or gogo. a very easy way to create *.mp3 from complete CD with playlist and html index. lucky day Peter
