On Wed, 23 Feb 2000 kmself@ix.netcom.com wrote: kmself >It will work. For a while. Jaz is essentially just another SCSI kmself >device. However neither the media nor the drives are reliable under kmself >long (or short) term use, in my experience.
jaz drives are some of the biggest pieces of shit ive used. ive yet to find a good backup..i can never trust a jaz. kmself >My experience is a Jaz drive and six disks purchased since 1997. I've kmself >replaced the drive three times, as well as four disks. Under Linux (RH kmself >4.2, 5.0, 5.2, and Debian Potato), any media ultimately starts returning kmself >sense read (or is it read sense?) errors after time. When these get kmself >sufficiently bad, the system locks up. i've returned about 12 disks, on the last batch(usually return in groups of 2 or 3) one of them was bad right out of the shrinkwrap kmself >I recently asked an open session at BALUG what I could do to improve kmself >operability of the drive under Linux. The consensus response was "tell kmself >us how far you can throw it". one good thing about jaz, is as long as iomega stays in business i can keep RMA'n disks :) gotta love the lifetime warranty. if you use a drive i suggest you keep all data(thats important) on a more reliable source for when(not if, when) the disk/drive dies. then its safe to use jaz nate ----------------------------------------[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- Vice President Network Operations http://www.firetrail.com/ Firetrail Internet Services Limited http://www.aphroland.org/ Everett, WA 425-348-7336 http://www.linuxpowered.net/ Powered By: http://comedy.aphroland.org/ Debian 2.1 Linux 2.0.36 SMP http://yahoo.aphroland.org/ -----------------------------------------[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- 11:30am up 187 days, 23:50, 1 user, load average: 1.70, 1.20, 1.06
