For tight ram systems, I use blackbox. It's very clean and FAST. ----- Original Message ----- From: "aphro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Hans" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: "Debian user mailinglist" <debian-user@lists.debian.org>; <recipient list not shown: ;> Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2000 12:04 PM Subject: Re: Pathetic Performance
> after using afterstep for so long twm just feels bland..id use it if i > needed it(was low on memory) but if i had a choice..ack! i cant see my > self using it cept in last resort..i havent used it much so im sure i > havent gotten to appreciate it's benefits(if it has any other then memory > conservation :) ) i find it hard to live without afterstep's > desktop/window management though. nothing else i've tried > (gnome/E/kde/windowmaker to some extent) compares.. > > nate > > On Thu, 27 Jan 2000, Hans wrote: > > hansfo >>and i'd suggest going to fvwm (or even twm *shiver*) to reduce memory > hansfo >>usage even further. > hansfo > > hansfo >Why would you shiver over twm. I dumped all my wm's and now run twm > hansfo >exclusively and I'm happier than ever :^) -- Hans > hansfo > > hansfo > > hansfo >-- > hansfo >Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null > hansfo > > > ----------------------------------------[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- > Vice President Network Operations http://www.firetrail.com/ > Firetrail Internet Services Limited http://www.aphroland.org/ > Everett, WA 425-348-7336 http://www.linuxpowered.net/ > Powered By: http://comedy.aphroland.org/ > Debian 2.1 Linux 2.0.36 SMP http://yahoo.aphroland.org/ > -----------------------------------------[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- > 8:58am up 160 days, 21:05, 1 user, load average: 1.02, 1.05, 1.07 > > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
