Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On 11/1/2000 Phil Brutsche wrote: > > >Keyword mostly. > > > >It still wouldn't hurt to check it with egcs 1.1.2 or gcc 2.7.2.3. You > >never know, this might be a part that's not 2.95.x safe. > > yes obviously the way to test for a 2.95 bug is to compile with older > compilers and see if the problem persists, but the point is > developers are now saying you can use 2.95 (and SHOULD so that > remaining problems can be found and fixed). if nobody uses 2.95 > then the problems that remain will not get fixed.
I recompiled the kernel and all the modules with gcc-2.7.2.3. The problem persists. Any further ideas? -- Arcady Genkin http://www.thpoon.com "'What good is my pity? Is not the pity the cross upon which he who loves man is nailed?..'" (Zarathustra - F. Nietzsche)
