On 01-Jan-2000 Ben Collins wrote:
> After looking at the source, it seems that either time.nist.gov was
> returning too much data, or none at all. Note, this worked when I used my
> ISP's local Solaris time server, so this isn't a problem in rdate itself,
> it has something to do with the time.nist.gov server. Now after checking,
> it seems that it is returning more data than rdate expects.

I entered 'rdate -s lilypad' from my laptop and it worked, so I also don't
believe rdate is the problem.  I also had a problem with an update from
time.nist.gov.

--
Andrew

Reply via email to