Ethan Benson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> On 27/12/99 Arcady Genkin wrote:
> 
> >If I want to mount a partition with `sync' option, can I keep
> >`defaults'? I know `defaults' implies `async', but will explicitly
> >specifying `sync' override that?
> 
> yup, just like defaults,ro will mount readonly despite the fact that 
> defaults includes the rw option.
> 
> sync may not help though, i recently turned it on for the root 
> filesystem then a few days later i had massive fs corruption on it. 
> I don't THINK it was related because after the reinstall i left it 
> async and had it ruined again...
> 
> sync will for sure make the fs unbearably slow.

Yeah, I know. I only want to do it on my root partition. I had a power
failure yesterday, and there were problems when I rebooted.

On a side note, there is such thing as `softupdates' developed in
FreeBSD. Apparently, it allows synced disk I/O comparable in speed to
memory-based (async). Is anything like that going to be implemented
for ext2fs?

(For those of you who haven't heard of softupdates)
http://www.ece.cmu.edu/~ganger/papers/CSE-TR-254-95/
-- 
Arcady Genkin                                http://wgaf.dyndns.org
"'What good is my pity? Is not the pity the cross upon which he who
loves man is nailed?..'" (Zarathustra - F. Nietzsche)

Reply via email to