[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Bushnell, BSG) writes: > Did you miss Miles Bader's correct message about emacs version > numbering?
No. His email prompted my question. I didn't realize he was *sure*, and I wanted to double check before I go make irreversable (well without using epochs) changes in the Debian package. The real problem was that I didn't notice the release of 20.5 until 20.5a was available. If I had seen 20.5, then I wouldn't have been confused. I must not be on the right emacs list for announcements... > Emacs 20.5a IS newer than emacs 20.5. Thanks. -- Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> PGP=E80E0D04F521A094 532B97F5D64E3930
