In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Michael Heironimus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Tue, Jan 21, 2003 at 12:07:41PM -0500, Robert L. Harris wrote: >> I'm looking at my automount situation and wondering. Is one going >> away? Which is the "way to go" for automounting, amd or autofs? > >I think that autofs is currently the preferred method. Whether or not >you choose to agree with the preferred method is up to you, for example >knfsd seems to be the preferred NFS server these days and I've had fewer >problems with the old userland server.
Well, since 2.4.17 or so, knfsd is actually a lot better than the old userland server. It's faster, and it actually handles renames etc right. With the userlevel NFS server, I could not run dpkg-buildpackage in an NFS mounted directory, the NFS server always choked on the renames. Mike. -- They all laughed when I said I wanted to build a joke-telling machine. Well, I showed them! Nobody's laughing *now*! -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
