On Sun, Nov 28, 1999 at 09:34:25AM +1100, Brian May wrote > > Anyone knows what this error means? > > This message *was* posted to debian-user, despite the error. I > got replies... > > Also, note that the address the bounced message was posted "to" > an illegal address. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] doesn't exist, nor have I ever used it. > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED] missing > >
You can tell that the post to debian-user was successful, by the Received: fields in the returned copy of your mail: > Received: from murphy.debian.org([209.41.108.199]) by 21cn.com(JetMail > 2.3.2.1) > with SMTP id /aimcque/jmail.rcv/5/jm0383de3cf; Thu, 25 Nov 1999 > 22:18:17 -0000 It looks like the message you received was generated by a list recipient in 21cn.com; a quick whois shows this to be somewhere in Guandong, China. I'd guess they are running a poorly-configured end-user mail filtering tool, or perhaps a badly mangled/configured MTA, as: - The return address they have chosen is a composite of the fields in your own From and Sender fields: > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED], May <[EMAIL PROTECTED] (best guess: take the first work from From:, and qualify it with the Sender: domain). - They are objecting to the recipient as listed in the text of the message, not to the envelope recipient. Further breakage at their end is evident in that they used murphy.debian.org (the host that handed them your message) as a relay for snoopy.apana.org.au. Depending on which web pages you read, JetMail is either a FidoNet-oriented list manager for the Atari ST, or a "powerful Internet standards-based email server for small companies, businesses, and corporate remote offices. It is designed to be simple for the novice administrator to setup and configure." Sounds like one to avoid, in either event :-). I'd guess that the message you got reflects either someone's badly broekn attempt to prevent mail relaying, or a failure of their mail filtering setup due to not being able to deal with "To:" fields that don't correspond to known local addresses (perhaps it is a local "unbundler", handling mail as a gateway for a hidden domain, that requires recognisable To: addresses to allow forwarding to appropriate recipients?). I wouldn't worry about it, unless it keeps happening; it looks like it is Someone Else's Problem. John P. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Oh - I - you know - my job is to fear everything." - Bill Gates in Denmark