i agree ..it looks great..if your willing to sacrafice the speed..for some its worth it ..its always nice to have the choice. i for use chose afterstep, and it flies. kde is a DOG compared to it..i havent tried E for a couple years back then it was pretty slow ..but was useable..never figured out how to edit the menus to add programs so i stopped usin it.
nate ----------------------------------------[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- Vice President Network Operations http://www.firetrail.com/ Firetrail Internet Services Limited http://www.aphroland.org/ Everett, WA 425-348-7336 http://www.linuxpowered.net/ Powered By: http://comedy.aphroland.org/ Debian 2.1 Linux 2.0.36 SMP http://yahoo.aphroland.org/ -----------------------------------------[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- 10:39pm up 76 days, 10:06, 1 user, load average: 0.34, 0.38, 0.36 On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, David J. Kanter wrote: > Am I the only one who finds Enlightenment bloated, too busy and too hard to > read? I'm willing to listen to those who use it; but after trying it out > last night, I'm not too willing to switch from my speedy and trusty fvwm2 or > window maker. > -- > David J. Kanter > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > "Humans have an innate tendency to attribute significance to anomalies > and coincidences." > -- John Allen Paulos, mathematics professor at Temple University > > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null >
