i think it has something to do with them not allowing modified binaries to be released, plain binaries are fine i believe, most other distros have them..i remember slackware had it. not sure what all patches debian developers add to pine ..
nate ----------------------------------------[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- Vice President Network Operations http://www.firetrail.com/ Firetrail Internet Services Limited http://www.aphroland.org/ Everett, WA 425-348-7336 http://www.linuxpowered.net/ Powered By: http://comedy.aphroland.org/ Debian 2.1 Linux 2.0.36 SMP http://yahoo.aphroland.org/ -----------------------------------------[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- 11:52am up 75 days, 23:19, 1 user, load average: 0.34, 0.28, 0.28 On Wed, 3 Nov 1999, Matthew Dalton wrote: > Hi there, > > Can anyone tell me, in 500 words or less, what it is about the Pine > license that Debian includes it only as source and in non-free? > > Matthew > > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null >
