>> I've just compiled the lastest GNOME release >>(October GNOME) for >>slink >> >> deb http://www.debian.org/~vincent/ unstable main
>>Joop Stakenborg wrote: >> All you packages end in -0.slink.0_i386.deb >> Does this mean this is a unstable slink >>october-gnome? >>Vincent Renardias wrote: >> As long as it hasn't been more widely tested, it >>certainly won't be >> considered as stable... >>I think the point is that users will presume that the >>`unstable' >>path in the apt-get URL refers to potato and not to >>`untested'. >>Why not rename your "unstable" directory to something >>like >>"slink-compat" ? >>Peter He already has another directory 'slink-update' with similar files. (unless this is a simlink). ===== Amateur Radio, when all else fails! http://www.qsl.net/wa2mze Debian Gnu Linux, Live Free or ..... __________________________________________________ Do You Yahoo!? Bid and sell for free at http://auctions.yahoo.com
