its supposed to. i'd stick with 2.2.10 unless there is something specific in the newer ones you want. in my experience 2.2.10 is BY FAR the best 2.2.x kernel(although i never tried a few, missed .3 .4 .6 .7 ..)
the reason(i read it, could be wrong)for the problems in 2.2.11 -.12 is there was a large number of fixes backported to 2.2.11 which introduced a lot of new problems(why do this in a stable kernel?! ack) and theyve been working on ironing o ut the bugs ever since. hopefully 2.2.13 is as stable as 2.2.10 nate ----------------------------------------[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- Linux System Administrator http://www.firetrail.com/ Firetrail Internet Services Limited http://www.aphroland.org/ Everett, WA 425-348-7336 http://www.linuxpowered.net/ Powered By: http://comedy.aphroland.org/ Debian 2.1 Linux 2.0.36 SMP http://yahoo.aphroland.org/ -----------------------------------------[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ]-- On Wed, 20 Oct 1999, Aaron Solochek wrote: > Yeah, 2.2.12. Is 2.2.13 going to fix this, hopefully? > > -Aaron Solochek > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > aphro wrote: > > > what kernel are u running ? 2.2.11 and 2.2.12 both have pretty bad memory > > leaks (2.2.11 is the worst) > > > > nate >
