Last month I had a problem: in short, I installed potato, and noticed
that name resolution hung, although things worked fine if I used a
numeric IP address.
I've included below the plea for help that I sent last month. It
describes the problem in detail.
Well, in case anyone's interested, I have some more information that
leads me to suspect that the problem is in the kernel (and thus,
presumably, in the Vortex driver). Here's what I did:
* I installed potato from scratch. I did this by installing slink
from an official Debian 2.1 CD, and then doing `apt-get
dist-upgrade' with my /etc/apt/sources.list pointing at
http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable
Thus I wound up with the latest (as of this morning) binaries, but
with the 2.0.36 kernel from the CD. (Apparantly `apt-get
dist-upgrade' didn't automatically give me a new kernel.) This
system worked flawlessly; in particular, name resolution worked
fine.
* I installed kernel-image-2.2.12 (version 2.2.12-3), and rebooted.
Name resolution hung exactly as described below.
* I reinstalled kernel-image-2.0.36, and rebooted; name resolution
worked just fine.
So it seems to me that the newer kernel is doing something wrong. If
anyone would like me to perform some experiments, so as to isolate the
problem, I'd be happy to do them; just tell me what you need done.
Unfortunately, I know nothing about how the net card driver works, so
I don't know how to investigate this on my own.
Here's the plea that I sent last month:
Can anyone tell me what's wrong with my system? At first I assumed it
was a bug in the resolver library, and opened a bug against libc6 in
Debian potato (http://www.debian.org/Bugs/db/45/45912.html); but the
Debian libc6 maintainer is sure that my system is merely
misconfigured.
Here's the problem:
When I type `ping blarg.net' at a shell, `ping' hangs. I expect it to
display
PING blarg.net (206.124.128.1): 56 data bytes
64 bytes from 206.124.128.1: icmp_seq=0 ttl=62 time=25.7 ms
...
Other name resolution also fails. For example, Netscape hangs when
trying to visit web pages on machines other than mine.
On the other hand, if I type `ping 206.124.128.1', that works fine.
So I know that IP and the network card aren't entirely broken.
I've never sat around and waited to see if `ping' eventually gets
unstuck; I've always given up and hit control-C after no more than
perhaps a minute.
I'm using potato (that is, the still-unreleased version of Debian
GNU/Linux), which I installed by first installing slink (i.e., Debian
2.1) from an official CD-ROM, and then using `apt-get dist-upgrade'
from
http://http.us.debian.org/debian unstable main
I did that update around 24 September.
Here is some information about the broken system:
Package: netbase
Version: 3.16-2
Package: kernel-image-2.2.9
Version: 2.2.9-2
My network card driver is 3c59x:
Sep 24 07:21:13 potato kernel: 3c59x.c:v0.99H 11/17/98 Donald Becker
http://cesdis.gsfc.nasa.gov/linux/drivers/vortex.html
Sep 24 07:21:13 potato kernel: eth0: 3Com 3Com Boomerang (unknown
version) at 0xb800, 00:50:04:1b:f6:df, IRQ 11
Sep 24 07:21:13 potato kernel: 8K byte-wide RAM 5:3 Rx:Tx split,
autoselect/Autonegotiate interface.
Sep 24 07:21:13 potato kernel: MII transceiver found at address 24,
status 182d.
Sep 24 07:21:13 potato kernel: Enabling bus-master transmits and
whole-frame receives.
This problem didn't always happen, although I don't remember exactly
when it started. I know for certain that it didn't happen immediately
after I installed slink, nor did it happen immediately after I
upgraded to potato the first time.
I've also seen this problem on a different installation of slink (on
the same machine with the same hardware), but that problem
mysteriously went away. I now have both slink and potato on this
machine, and slink works flawlessly. Only potato has this
name-resolution problem.
I haven't noticed any error messages -- certainly none at the shell on
which I ran `ping', and none in /var/log.
I connect to the Internet via DSL, using a Cisco 675 router, which is
a little grey box that sits on the floor (the phone company gave it to
me when I signed up for DSL). I have a phone cord that connects the
router and my phone jack; I have an Ethernet cable that connects the
router and my network card.
The router is quite configurable, and perhaps its configuration is
relevant:
* I've got it set to act as a DHCP server, although since I don't know
how to make Debian use DHCP, I've told Debian to use a static IP
address. Since I only have one computer, there is no risk of having
two IP addresses conflict.
* It's doing something called `network address translation', which, as
I understand it, means that my machine "appears" to the outside
world to have a different IP address than what the machine thinks.
That is (as you can see below in my network configuration files), my
machine thinks its IP address is 10.0.0.2, but the outside world
uses 206.124.128.30 (that address might change from time to time,
because the router might be a DHCP client of my ISP). Also, if I
were to connect other machines to the router (with an Ethernet hub),
they would get IP addresses like 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4, etc.; but they
would *all* appear to the outside world as 206.124.128.30. It would
appear that this would cause total confusion, but it doesn't;
somehow this `network address translation' keeps things from getting
confused. I don't understand how it does this, but it seems to work
OK. (The place I work used to have a similar setup; they had five
machines connected to the Internet, all "sharing" an outside IP
address; the machines all worked fine.) The one tradeoff that I
know of is that nobody in the outside world can connect to any
servers that I run, because the network address translation
apparantly futzes with port numbers. For example, my SMTP server
listens on port 25, but someone who tries to connect to that port
using my outside IP address 206.124.128.30 won't be able to.
Presumably, if they could guess the port to which the router has
"mapped" port 25, they could connect to that port.
There may be some more information about the configuration of this
box that is relevant. Please feel free to ask me about it, if you
think it would help.
Perhaps some of the following network configuration files are
relevant:
/etc/resolv.conf:
nameserver 206.124.128.1
nameserver 206.124.128.3
/etc/hosts:
127.0.0.1 localhost loopback
10.0.0.1 cisco-router
10.0.0.2 potato
/etc/init.d/network:
#! /bin/sh
ifconfig lo 127.0.0.1
route add -net 127.0.0.0
IPADDR=10.0.0.2
NETMASK=255.255.255.0
NETWORK=10.0.0.0
BROADCAST=10.0.0.255
GATEWAY=10.0.0.1
ifconfig eth0 ${IPADDR} netmask ${NETMASK} broadcast ${BROADCAST}
route add -net ${NETWORK}
[ "${GATEWAY}" ] && route add default gw ${GATEWAY} metric 1
Note that those three files are almost-exact copies of the same files
on my slink system, which as I said works fine. The only differences
are
--- /slink/etc/resolv.conf Sun Sep 12 04:06:13 1999
+++ /potato/etc/resolv.conf Mon Sep 20 22:00:49 1999
@@ -1,3 +1,2 @@
-search hanchrow.org
nameserver 206.124.128.1
nameserver 206.124.128.3
(I don't know what that `search' line is doing on my slink system; I
assume that it got put there when I installed the system)
--- /slink/etc/hosts Sun Sep 12 12:49:07 1999
+++ /potato/etc/hosts Tue Sep 21 22:29:44 1999
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
127.0.0.1 localhost loopback
10.0.0.1 cisco-router
- 10.0.0.2 snowball
\ No newline at end of file
+ 10.0.0.2 potato
+
Now, here's the kicker: the problem goes away if I run `tcpdump': I do
tcpdump &
ping blarg.net
and `ping' responds correctly. I can then kill `tcpdump', and until
the next time I boot, the network works fine. It's as if `tcpdump'
changed something, and that change allows name resolution to work.
So that's the deal. Any ideas why my system is behaving this way, and
what I can do about it?
Thanks
