On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 06:02:38PM -0700, Seth R Arnold wrote: > On Fri, Sep 17, 1999 at 12:47:02AM +0200, Marcin Owsiany wrote: > > On Thu, Sep 16, 1999 at 04:44:21PM +0700, Usef Saiful Ulum wrote: > > > # make; make install > > > > err... shouldn't it be make && make install instead? > > The && means "execute the next one only if this one worked". If you really > trust the source, make ; make install works fine. If you are not so sure it > will compile, make && make install might save some headaches by preventing > a not-fully-compiled program from being installed. > > Unfortunatly, it is unlikely to help Usef directly in this case, though it > *is* good practice. :)
but I'm not saying: do make && make install instead of make;make install but: do make && make install instead of just make !!!!!!!! Marcin -- --------------------------------- Marcin Owsiany [EMAIL PROTECTED] ---------------------------------
