On Fri, 13 Aug 1999, Alisdair McDiarmid wrote: > On Fri, Aug 13, 1999 at 10:25:50AM -0700, Mike Nachlinger wrote: > > On Fri, 13 Aug 1999 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > > > Does anyone have experience with the following? > > > > > > 1. Running AcceleratedX with Debian. > > > 2. Running Xfree86 3.3.4 with Debian. > > > 3. Having them both available on one machine. > > > > > > > You have to install and have working an X server before installing > > AcceleratedX. > > I've been using it for about 5 years on differant video cards and it works > > great. Don't know about the G400 on 5.x but I've got a G200 on 4.2 and it > > works > > much better then Xfree86. > > I've got a G200 AGP in my main box, running XF86 3.3.3.1, and it > seems quite stable and reasonably quick. What's better about > AcceleratedX? > > > As for stability AcceleratedX has Xfree86 beat here also. > > X crashes suck. > > > I understand Xfree86 has got much better however. AX supports > > many more cards, it's money well spent! > > I might be interested in buying it if it's significantly faster, I > suppose, but is it? > --
Yes, 50-100% depending on your graphics card. See the benchmarks at www.xig.com. Mike +---------------------------------------------+ | Mike Nachlinger BAC Travel Director | | (408) 446-9914 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | +---------------------------------------------+
