Jason writes: > Apparently it is usable enough to startup and run scripts. What you might > be able to get away with is to put a normal Depends: librealine on bash - > but I am not sure.
> Probably the best answer is that bash should not require bash to install > itself! A while back I had a library wreck that hosed up bash: I got out of it by linking sh to ash. Maybe bash needs to depend on ash :) -- John Hasler [EMAIL PROTECTED] (John Hasler) Dancing Horse Hill Elmwood, WI
