It's not all that stable if you're keeping up with the upgrades and changes constantly being released. Major stuff has been broken (and then later fixed) recently by updated packages.
If you get one up and running with *exactly* what you need and aren't going to use the package systems to upgrade it anymore from that point until it's more stable or until you have another machine you can check stuff on, DON'T run mission-critical stuff on it. My opinion, but one I've seen here many times. Unstable means unstable. Period. And honestly, my critical slink machines do a great job... Make sure to add a line to /etc/apt/sources.list that has the correct info for security.debian.org's stuff for slink so you get any critical security updates -- and don't forget to check for them once in a while. The line would be: deb http://security.debian.org/ stable updates +-----------------------------------+--------------------------------+ | Nate Duehr - [EMAIL PROTECTED] | Support Amateur Radio & Linux! | | Private Pilot, Telephony Engineer | Ham Callsign: N0NTZ | | UNIX Hack, Perl Hack, Tech-Freak | Grid Square: DM79 | | | "May the Source be with you." | +-----------------------------------+--------------------------------+ | HamRadio and Linux mailing lists available for interested parties: | | http://www.natetech.com/mailman/listinfo | +--------------------------------------------------------------------+ On Tue, 27 Jul 1999, Account for Debian group mail wrote: > > Anyone using the Potato release on a machine that needs to be up. How > stable is it at this point? > > Thanks, > > Ken Rea > > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null > >