Subject: Re: A Pet Peeve about posting on the lists Date: Wed, Jul 21, 1999 at 05:12:22PM -0400
In reply to:William T Wilson Quoting William T Wilson([EMAIL PROTECTED]): > On Wed, 21 Jul 1999, Wayne Topa wrote: > > > I just did an informal survey on which mailer program by those > > offenders are using. > > > > Pine 8 > > As a long-time Pine user (check the headers) I must confess that I have > been occasionally guilty of the same offense. > > The problem is that, although Pine manages to set the in-reply-to: > headers, etc. it does not give the user an opportunity to edit them - even > if you turn on full header mode. > > If there's a way to get at that particular header, please, let me know. > > Which means that the uses is responsible for adding the mailing list to > his address book, remembering the list address (heh), or... screwing up > the threads. > > > Might it be that these mail programs have poor docs? Might it be that > > the people that use them don't realize how badly these posts mess up > > That's part of it (both of them). > > > the display of good MUA's. Might it be OK for me to recommend that > > they take a look at mutt. So, are there any Pine experts out there that have figured out a 'good' way to edit the Full Headers? I must confess that all my experiences with Pine have been purged. With mutt its easy, ,L to reply to a list, ,r to reply to an person, and m to start a new mail. I would have thought Pine had a way to generate a new mail. Humm, it can only reply? Well anyway, thanks for trying anyway. Wayne > > Bah. > -- Real computer scientists don't program in assembler. They don't write in anything less portable than a number two pencil. _______________________________________________________ Wayne T. Topa <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>