On Sun, 11 Jul 1999, Antti-Juhani Kaijanaho wrote: > On Sat, Jul 10, 1999 at 11:26:19PM +1000, Hamish Moffatt wrote: > > Or even 8, since an int is 32 bits. > > int can be anything from 16 bits up.
we do not have such architectures, i believe > In fact, I believe we have > architectures where int is 64 bits. well, that is not true either. I believe Linux follows LP64 model on 64bit hw, where long and pointer are 64bits while int is still 32bits > Do *not* depend on the size of int! agreed OK
