lspci is a 2.2.x only thing.. cause I noticed I have booted to old rescue 2.0.36 and this fails..
But I could be wrong... that is one thing I have noticed -----Original Message----- From: Craig McPherson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: debian-user@lists.debian.org <debian-user@lists.debian.org> Date: Wednesday, 9 June 1999 13:33 Subject: A default 2.2.x kernel for potato? I'm currently using slink with the default kernel, and am currently downloading packages to update to potato, and I was wondering if there is a default kernel for potato like there's a default 2.0.36 kernel for slink. I tried the "linux" kernel from the potato/main/disks directory, but it seems to be a 2.0.36 kernel identical to the kernel from the slink disks directory. If I just upgrade all my base & recommended packages to the new versions from the unstable/main directory of an FTP mirror, while still using a 2.0.36 kernel, will the system run, or do some of the upgraded packages need to run under 2.2.x? Also, now that I've updated my package list with packages from the unstable directory, the conflict manager seems to want to remove the "kbd" package... it conflicts with another console-manager package, and whenever I try to disable that package, the conflict manager re-enables it and enables kbd. Does this new console manager replace kbd? I ask because kbd is in the Base section, and dpkg install generates a polite warning telling me that kbd shouldn't be removed unless I'm absolutely sure what I'm doing, which, of course, I'm not. Thanks for any help. -- Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null
