"Fethi A. Okyar" wrote: > > Hello all, > > want to bring the insane naming convention into argument here > for one second. > > This remains to be a mystery for me, I don't know hw I ended up > confusing all the names, slink potato, hamm, beef, etc.. Now I > go down to the source (i.e. ftp.debian.org) and try to figure out > which kernel version is used in which name by looking at base > packages. > > Can somebody clear this out by pointing the stable, unstable and > old kernel versions, sorry for valuable cputimes I am consuming, > Is there any plan on keeping this naming convention?? >
That's very simple Fethi: if the x from 2.x.n is ODD, then the kernel is unstable, if its even, then its stable! -- Jean-Yves Barbier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Les choses ne sont pas toujours ce que l'on voudrait qu'elles soient qu'elles fussent..." P. DAC Boycott Intel, watch: http://www.bigbrotherinside.com
