Just my 2 cents: I don't lose anything when using Linux as a server. I have it set up as for web testing, and it works like a hose. In fact, I wouldn't run anything else on a server. Period.
Unfortunately, there are web development and multimedia apps that I use that are not ported to Linux. These apps are not replaceable by anything available for Linux (yet). And until they are, Linux will not have all of my hard drive. I don't want to settle for second best in my apps because they're my bread and butter, even if that means I have to dual-boot with Winblows. I spend more time using my apps than playing with my OS. -Jeff { praying that Macromedia eventually sees its way clear to port Dreamweaver and Director to Linux } -----Original Message----- From: Kent West <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Lev Lvovsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Debian users Listserv <debian-user@lists.debian.org> Date: Sunday, March 28, 1999 3:14 PM Subject: Re: What DO you lose with Linux ??? >Lev Lvovsky wrote: >> the question is tho, other than electricity consumption, what's so wrong >> with running more than one computer? > >1) Up-front cash outlay for the second computer (important to poor folks >like myself) >2) Physical desk space. >Other than that, I'm all in favor of having two or three computers >running at the same time. > >Just my 1 cent (I'm too poor to pay attention, much less give away 2 >cents) :) > > >-- >Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null >