Yeah, I know about (and use dreamweaver and fireworks); My question is more about linux based stuff. In addition, my focus simply about which app works more like a standard wordprocessor.
Dreamweaver is a heavyduty web design tool. I mean basic text document formatting (in html). But you're right, Dreamweaver is the best of the best. Let's email the hell out of macromedia and make them do a linux port. NatePuri Certified Law Student & Debian GNU/Linux Monk McGeorge School of Law [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ompages.com On Thu, 18 Mar 1999, Steve Lamb wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thu, 18 Mar 1999 19:11:47 -0600, Stephen Pitts wrote: > > vi works best. There are few things worse than editing WSIWYG produced html. > > Then you've been using the wrong tools. Macromedia's Dreamweaver (yeah, > I know, Windows, but hear me out) is a WYSIWYG HTML editor that doesn't > produce ugly code because it doesn't change the code you put into it and the > code it does generate is quite nice. I rarely have problems with the code > it generates and before Macromedia I used joe and did all my HTML by hand. > > - -- > Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your > ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls. > - > -------------------------------+--------------------------------------------- > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: PGPsdk version 1.0 (C) 1997 Pretty Good Privacy, Inc > > iQA/AwUBNvGmvnpf7K2LbpnFEQLShgCeKprSYTroRNE5zh82mNcRGruDX9AAn2v6 > lx4yJqbagI3LajZbuCdVP4Yh > =bYZK > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > > > -- > Unsubscribe? mail -s unsubscribe [EMAIL PROTECTED] < /dev/null > >
