-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, 8 Mar 1999 09:52:46 -0500, Ben Collins wrote:
>> I think these criticisms are overstated in many cases. Ever try to get
>> ppp running on Solaris? I have installed many distributions. The initial
>> install is only a portion of the problem. The rest comes in getting the
>> system configured the way that you need it. That is where Debian excels.
>Yes, I have gotten Solaris's PPP configured and, yes it did suck
>royally. But that's not the point, Debian does have short comings, and
>poeple are aware of them. No matter how much they overstated it, we
>need to address these issues.
I personally don't think that the PPP setup needs work. I found it
quite simple. So simple that the first time I set up Debian I missed it and
feel like a complete putz.
Windows PPP setup is harder because it is in several different and
non-obvious places. Sure, Debian may have problems, but this isn't one of
them.
- --
Steve C. Lamb | I'm your priest, I'm your shrink, I'm your
ICQ: 5107343 | main connection to the switchboard of souls.
- -------------------------------+---------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGPsdk version 1.0 (C) 1997 Pretty Good Privacy, Inc
iQA/AwUBNuQ9gnpf7K2LbpnFEQIL0QCfe3wchfP4+wTeVSx6FEo4nk7YUGwAn0Cj
N1LV3Mtqo1PHoAAZuDpQ5zTf
=orQE
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
