John Gedeon wrote: > I have Debian installed on my home computer (3.0 stable version) I want > to use it to remote login in to work, however the people in charge of the > remote logins (IT) at my work say that Debian has lots of security holes. I > was wondering what security holes Debian may have (especially in comparison > to Red Hat) if any. And if any of those cannot be taken care of. They also > claimed that Debian isn't stable in comparison to Red Hat, Is Red Hat more > stable? From what I have read and understand Debian is very stable and > secure (at least it is equivalent in security and stability to Red Hat). Is > this true? > > I am asking for this information so that I have more backing when I tell > the IT people here that Debian as good if not better than Red Hat. I would > prefer to use Debian.
The IT people at your workplace are uninformed. When a vulnerability is publicized, Debian usually has a fix out before Red Hat does; sometimes Red Hat's fix comes out as much as several weeks later. Also, Debian's installer has less of a tendency to give you all sorts of vulnerable services most people don't need, so the default installation is more secure than Red Hat's. I don't recall ever seeing a Debian machine crash, so I'm not sure how Debian could possibly less stable than Red Hat. Craig
msg22049/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
