[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Subject: > > debian-user-digest Digest Volume 2003 : Issue 16 > > Today's Topics: > Re: Programs Won't Run -- Can't find [ Nicos Gollan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > Unidentified subject! [ Jason Pepas <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > Re: real player plugin only as root [ Aryan Ameri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > Re: debian-user-digest Digest V2003 [ Clay Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > adding ssl to apache1.3? [ "Robert L. Harris" <Robert.L.Harris ] > Re: OpenGL [ "nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > Re: Unidentified subject! [ Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Subject: Re: Programs Won't Run -- Can't find Library > Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 19:49:37 +0100 > From: Nicos Gollan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thursday 02 January 2003 19:26, Hal Vaughan wrote: > > I used apt-get to install a few games -- most not ably, Enigma, and > > Mirror Magic. Whenever I try to run either from the console, I get: > > > > error while loading shared libraries: libvorbisfile.so.0: cannot open > > shared ojbect file: No such file or directory > > > > I do have /usr/libs/libvorbisfile.so.3, but not .so.0. I thought > > apt-get was supposed to resolve dependency problems like this. > > This problem already occured some time ago. It should help if you go to > /usr/lib and create the .so.0 as a symlink to .so.3. > > - -- > Embedded Linux -- True multitasking! > TWO TOASTS AT THE SAME TIME! > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.2.0 (GNU/Linux) > > iD8DBQE+FInHeOF0+zcVdv8RAsHDAJ4k+MTSOd5z83UNDrUvF/oR1Mzv0QCdFiE3 > 3QICzt/ywwxFNdLhvKdOMoY= > =1thq > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Subject: Unidentified subject! > Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 12:56:25 -0600 > From: Jason Pepas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > I don't know what to file a bugreport against, checkinstall, man, groff or lp? > > (pts/3)jason@marsala:~$ zcat /usr/share/man/man1/checkinstall.1.gz | groff > -mand > <standard input>:106: warning: `spec' not defined (probable missing space > after > > gv displays nothing > > (pts/3)jason@marsala:~$ zcat /usr/share/man/man1/checkinstall.1.gz | groff > -mand > <standard input>:106: warning: `spec' not defined (probable missing space > after > (pts/3)jason@marsala:~$ gv /tmp/foo.ps > > gv displays the page correctly > > (pts/3)jason@marsala:~$ zcat /usr/share/man/man1/checkinstall.1.gz | groff > -mand > <standard input>:106: warning: `spec' not defined (probable missing space > after > request id is epson-197 (1 file(s)) > > (pts/3)jason@marsala:~$ man -t checkinstall | lp > /tmp/zman8FWIIT:106: warning: `spec' not defined (probable missing space after > ` > request id is epson-199 (1 file(s)) > > these both print the man page, but appear to start from the second page. > > (pts/3)jason@marsala:~$ man checkinstall | lp > Reformatting checkinstall(1), please wait... > /tmp/zmanySH7Iv:106: warning: `spec' not defined (probable missing space after > ` > request id is epson-198 (1 file(s)) > > this also prints the man page, and also starts on the second page, but starts > from a different spot. > > your opinions are welcome. > > -jason pepas > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Subject: Re: real player plugin only as root > Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 22:33:28 +0330 > From: Aryan Ameri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: ernst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, John Kerr Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > CC: debian-user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > On Thursday 02 January 2003 21:37, ernst wrote: > > you scould check the rights > > > > (chmod a+rw /dev/dsp) > > > > # ls -la /dev/dsp > > crw-rw-rw- 1 root audio 14, 3 Nov 4 2001 /dev/dsp > > # > > > > Well, I have RealPlayer, and all the permissions are correct and the mozilla > plugin is loaded, but I can't use it. Mozilla doesn't bring the program up > when needed, and when I run the program itself, I get an error message > telling me that cannot open audio device, another program might be using it. > > Cheers > Aryan > > > On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, John Kerr Anderson wrote: > > > Hello, > > > > > > I recently tried installing Real Player 8 plugin for Netscape 7.0. > > > NS7.0 recognises the plugin for all users, but when I try to listen to > > > Netscape radio, only root can hear the sound. > > > > > > Can anyone tell me how to get the sound to work for other users? Any > > > advice would be helpful... > > > > > > Thanks in advance! :-) > > > > > > John Kerr Anderson > > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Subject: Re: debian-user-digest Digest V2003 #13 > Date: Thu, 02 Jan 2003 13:17:00 -0600 > From: Clay Trotter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Please remove me from your email > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > Subject: > > > > debian-user-digest Digest Volume 2003 : Issue 13 > > > > Today's Topics: > > Re: kde still sucks and gnome2 rocks [ Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > > Re: Nvidia compile error [SOLVED] [ Elijah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > > Re: cannot open dislpay: debian:0.0 [ "Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > > Re: kde still sucks and gnome2 rocks [ "Mark L. Kahnt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED] ] > > Re: PCAnywhere and IPCHAINS [ "nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > > Re: mrtg and snmpd [ "nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > > Re: cannot open dislpay: debian:0.0 [ Frank Gevaerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > > Re: which files can be safely delete [ "nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > > Re: Nvidia compile error [SOLVED] [ Elijah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > > Re: Getting nVidia to load [ Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ] > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Subject: Re: kde still sucks and gnome2 rocks why? > > Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 07:11:39 -0800 > > From: Paul Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 09:24:10AM -0500, Walter Tautz [MFCF] wrote: > > > I'd love to hear an analysis of why gnome2 rocks and kde does not. Perhaps > > > others would like to read about it :-) > > > > KDE gets in my way in all the same ways Windows does. This is a Bad > > Thing. This has nothing to do with what theme or wm I'm using in KDE, > > KDE just seems to be overly grandious about providing a freaking > > desktop environment. The KDE menu is also organized very bizarrely > > (for someone coming from straight-out AfterStep). > > > > I've been using computers since I was 8, and I started on a VAX where > > my father was the sysadmin. I, of all people, should not be > > overwhelmed by KDE. Simplify it, folks! KDE is so baroque, it > > wouldn't surprise me if it pisses off Windows users, and you've seen > > what kind of interfacial abuse they subject themselves to. > > > > There is very little I can't change in sawfish or gnome as far as > > sawfish or gnome are concerned in more than five mouse clicks. > > > > However, one thing that tweaks me about both DEs, still, is that they > > go out and clone xterm. Uuh, why? And why make it as ugly and only > > slightly more useful than Windows Telnet? I realise that DE's are > > supposed to be most helpful for newbies, but *jeeze*, I have to wonder > > if anybody stopped for a moment and thought that maybe unleashing > > something as garish and stubborn as Windows Telnet on the Linux > > community isn't the right thing to do. > > > > -- > > .''`. Baloo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > : :' : proud Debian admin and user > > `. `'` > > `- Debian - when you have better things to do than to fix a system > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Part 1.2.1.2Type: application/pgp-signature > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Subject: Re: Nvidia compile error [SOLVED] > > Date: 02 Jan 2003 23:29:44 +0900 > > From: Elijah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Hi! > > > > It took me awhile to download new modutils, binutils, 2.4.20 kernel > > sources, etc. etc. .compile etc .. .. none worked for me. > > > > Then I searched all over forums, /usr/share/docs/, sites, etc. and found > > a suggestion to use the kernel-headers. I downloaded the > > kernel-headers.2.4.18.deb, untarred itself to /usr/src/, 'make install' > > the nvidia-kernels .. and it WORKED! ahhh that felt good ^.^ ... > > > > Compiling the kernel-source didn't help much so using the kernel-headers > > did it for me ... wow ... I've lost a ton of sleep on this one. > > > > Thanks very much to those who helped :) > > Elijah > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Subject: Re: cannot open dislpay: debian:0.0 > > Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 07:20:24 -0800 > > From: "Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "James Tappin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "James Tappin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 2:27 AM > > Subject: Re: cannot open dislpay: debian:0.0 > > > > > On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 02:12:34 -0800 > > > "Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > FYI > > > > If I try xhost +localhost > > > > xhost: unable to open display "debian:0.0" > > > > > > > > > > 3 alternatives spring to mind; either: > > > xhost +debian # as the original user > > > or: > > > export DISPLAY=localhost:0 # as root before running make xconfig > > > or even: > > > ssh -X root@localhost # instead of su > > > > > > -- > > > James Tappin, O__ "I forget the punishment for using > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- \/` Microsoft --- Something lingering > > > http://www.tappin.me.uk/ with data loss in it I fancy" > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > Same on all 3 > > > > unable to open display > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Subject: Re: kde still sucks and gnome2 rocks why? > > Date: 02 Jan 2003 10:30:26 -0500 > > From: "Mark L. Kahnt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > On Thu, 2003-01-02 at 09:53, Walter Tautz [MFCF] wrote: > > > On Fri, 3 Jan 2003, CaT wrote: > > > > > > > On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 09:24:10AM -0500, Walter Tautz [MFCF] wrote: > > > > > > KDE still sucks. > > > > > > > > > > I'd love to hear an analysis of why gnome2 rocks and kde does not. Perhaps > > > > > others would like to read about it :-) > > > > > > > > Oh for the love of god! Should I put this thread in my twitfilter now? > > > > > > > > -- > > > > All people are equal, > > > > But some are more equal then others. > > > > - George W. Bush Jr, President of the United States > > > > September 21, 2002 (Abridged version of security speech) > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > The intent was to get an analysis of the differences....alas this probably was > > > a bad idea since these kind of things usually don't end up being an analysis > > > but a contest who sucks least.... sigh > > > > My own observation is that each desktop environment and window manager > > is built with its own philosophy and design values, traded off with > > programming and design ability extended to the development. Peoples' > > preferences as to what they themselves use draws from their own > > priorities of what matters to them individually - be it speed, size, > > visual strengths or weaknesses, intuitive functionality, and choice of > > tools. Those that don't fit as much with one's own relative weighting of > > these values might be seen to be of increased "suckiness" ;) > > > > That means twm may be the cat's meow for some, while someone else wants > > Gnome on KDE with XPWE. Me, I run Gnome2 rather than KDE simply because > > I prefer the look and feel, and the ability to load up panels with > > applets - and since I run many gtk applications, many of the libraries > > that Gnome calls upon are already loaded. Some non-Gnome applications > > also call on gtk libraries, while I'm not familiar as yet of any non-KDE > > program calling on KDE libraries, outside of the QT toolkit (which isn't > > *really* KDE specific.) If I did use KDE applications, I'd probably be > > of a moderately different view, but currently, none of them are on my > > "favorites" list - that may change in the future. > > > > Does that mean it sucks? Nah - not to someone like me that still likes > > OpenWindows and FVWM in their own ways ;) > > -- > > Mark L. Kahnt, FLMI/M, ALHC, HIA, AIAA, ACS, MHP > > ML Kahnt New Markets Consulting > > Tel: (613) 531-8684 / (613) 539-0935 > > Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Name: signature.asc > > signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature > > Description: This is a digitally signed message part > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Subject: Re: PCAnywhere and IPCHAINS > > Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 07:40:06 -0800 (PST) > > From: "nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Simon Tneoh Chee-Boon said: > > > > > > I've executed the following commands: > > > ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L externalip 5631 -R internalip 5631 > > > ipmasqadm portfw -a -P udp -L externalip 5631 -R internalip 5631 > > > ipmasqadm portfw -a -P tcp -L externalip 5632 -R internalip 5632 > > > ipmasqadm portfw -a -P udp -L externalip 5632 -R internalip 5632 > > > ipmasqadm autofw -A -r tcp 5631 5632 -h internalip > > > ipmasqadm autofw -A -r udp 5631 5632 -h internalip > > > > why are you doing both autofw and portfw? I would just use portfw. > > > > Also be sure when your connecting to externalip you do so from > > OUTSIDE the NAT network. my experience is that you cannot connect to > > the external interface of a port forwarded system from behind the > > same NAT that forwards it. Nor can you connect to the port forwarded > > system on the external ip from the NAT box itself. > > > > nate > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Subject: Re: mrtg and snmpd > > Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 07:44:58 -0800 (PST) > > From: "nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > James Vahn said: > > > <grumble> What misfortune has befallen these previously fine packages? > > > Snmpd has become so confusing and hogtied that it no longer performs any > > > function at all.. Does anyone know why? > > > > not really, but when was snmp NOT confusing and hogtied ? I've never known > > it not to be confusing. > > > > interesting command though, never heard of it myself, I usually just edit > > the .conf file directly. > > > > since you mention MRTG I'll mention my MRTG howto: > > > > http://howto.aphroland.de/HOWTO/MRTG > > > > nate > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Subject: Re: cannot open dislpay: debian:0.0 > > Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 16:49:53 +0100 > > From: Frank Gevaerts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 07:20:24AM -0800, Kevin wrote: > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "James Tappin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 02, 2003 2:27 AM > > > Subject: Re: cannot open dislpay: debian:0.0 > > > > > > > > > > On Thu, 2 Jan 2003 02:12:34 -0800 > > > > "Kevin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > FYI > > > > > If I try xhost +localhost > > > > > xhost: unable to open display "debian:0.0" > > > > > > > > > > > > > 3 alternatives spring to mind; either: > > > > xhost +debian # as the original user > > > > or: > > > > export DISPLAY=localhost:0 # as root before running make xconfig > > > > or even: > > > > ssh -X root@localhost # instead of su > > > > > > > > -- > > > > James Tappin, O__ "I forget the punishment for using > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- \/` Microsoft --- Something lingering > > > > http://www.tappin.me.uk/ with data loss in it I fancy" > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > Same on all 3 > > > > try DISPLAY=:0 > > (localhost==127.0.0.1==IP, while :0 uses unix sockets; and debian defaults > > to not listen on IP ports) > > > > Frank > > > > > > unable to open display > > > > > > > > > -- > > > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Subject: Re: which files can be safely deleted? > > Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 07:54:53 -0800 (PST) > > From: "nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > Sandip P Deshmukh said: > > > > > i was wondering if there are any other redundant log files etc that i can > > > delete to make more space available. i for instance know that exim keeps a > > > log and it can be safely deleted. any other files? > > > > if your that tight on space you may not need documentation, so I > > would say remove any *doc packages you have as well as manpages then > > erase /usr/share/man and /usr/share/doc that is 74MB worth of data on > > my system here. It would be better to remove this then to remove log files. > > You could also configure logrotate to rotate logs out of existance faster. > > Also /usr/share/info can go (remove any info related packages first) > > > > use dpkg -S /path/to/file to find packages that are associated with > > certain files. > > > > but the documentation is the best stuff to delete, most of it is > > available online anyways. a quick search reveals that debian manual > > pages are available here: > > http://www.math.u-szeged.hu/dwww/ > > > > looks like general docs from /usr/share/doc are there as well. I don't > > know if this is a private site or public, or if it may go away in > > the future though. > > > > nate > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Subject: Re: Nvidia compile error [SOLVED] > > Date: 03 Jan 2003 00:19:23 +0900 > > From: Elijah <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > Hi! > > > > It took me awhile to download new modutils, binutils, 2.4.20 kernel > > sources, etc. etc. .compile etc .. .. none worked for me. > > > > Then I searched all over forums, /usr/share/docs/, sites, etc. and found > > a suggestion to use the kernel-headers. I downloaded the > > kernel-headers.2.4.18.deb, untarred itself to /usr/src/, 'make install' > > the nvidia-kernels .. and it WORKED! ahhh that felt good ^.^ ... > > > > Compiling the kernel-source didn't help much so using the kernel-headers > > did it for me ... wow ... I've lost a ton of sleep on this one. > > > > Thanks very much to those who helped :) > > Elijah > > > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > Subject: Re: Getting nVidia to load > > Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 08:10:55 -0800 (PST) > > From: Bill Moseley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: Larry Hunsicker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > CC: Debian user listserv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > On Thu, 2 Jan 2003, Larry Hunsicker wrote: > > > > > I am not sure why, in my setup, the nvidia kernel "make install" didn't > > > add the line to /etc/modules. The nVidia folks may not have wanted to > > > force this at boot up. But their documentation probably should note > > > that one needs to add this line to get the module loaded automatically. > > > > It doesn't need to be added, at least on my setup. > > > > $ /sbin/lsmod | fgrep nvidia > > nvidia 1467456 10 (autoclean) > > > > $ fgrep nvidia /etc/modules > > > > But I've installed the nvidia drivers twice now -- once via the debian > > source packages and once from using the tarballs from nvidia and following > > their instructions. So maybe when I used the Debian sources it added the > > file to modutils to demand load. > > > > $ cat /etc/modutils/nvidia-kernel-2.4.18-xfs-athlon > > alias /dev/nvidia* nvidia > > alias char-major-195 nvidia > > > > How module loading works is one of those unanswered questions I've posted > > to the debian-user list before. I think I understand insmod, and that > > modprobe uses modules.dep to load dependencies, but I don't really > > understand modules.conf and how it works with modproble. > > > > I've read the "alias" part of the man page for modules.conf but still > > don't understand what those "alias" lines above do. > > > > My *guess* is that the X nvidia_drv.o module opens /dev/nvidia* and that > > causes a demand load of the nvidia driver. But if that's the case I'm > > curious at what point the modules.conf file is parsed -- if that happens > > at boot or when /dev/nvidia* is accessed. > > > > Doesn't seem likely that it happens each time a device is accessed as that > > would be a lot of parsing of modules.conf. > > > > So if it happens at boot time then what loads that info into the kernel? > > > > Of course, I may have it all wrong. It probably works by magic. > > > > -- > > Bill Moseley [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Subject: adding ssl to apache1.3? > Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 14:21:58 -0500 > From: "Robert L. Harris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: Debian Users <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > I've got an apache1.3 server up and running. I've been thinking for a > while of adding ssl for the heck of it (nothing important on it, just > something I've wanted to to do). I added libapache-mod-ssl to my > debian unstable server. There's no doc/readme on configuring and > activating the openssl implementations. > > Anyone got a good HOWTO or link? > > Robert > > :wq! > --------------------------------------------------------------------------- > Robert L. Harris | PGP Key ID: FC96D405 > > DISCLAIMER: > These are MY OPINIONS ALONE. I speak for no-one else. > FYI: > perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(115),10);' > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > Part 1.6.1.2Type: application/pgp-signature > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Subject: Re: OpenGL > Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 11:22:00 -0800 (PST) > From: "nate" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Chris Burns said: > > > how do i get the GLX extension? > > be sure all opengl libraries that you need are installed(most likely > one/more of the mesa* packages), and turn on glx in the X config file > /etc/X11/XF86Config-4 > > sample from my nvidia setup: > > Section "Module" > Load "dbe" # Double buffer extension > Load "extmod" > SubSection "extmod" > EndSubSection > Load "type1" > Load "freetype" > Load "glx" > EndSection > > once that is done, restart X and/or your display managers so the new > config file can take effect. once done try running the command glxinfo. > > sample output: > [aphro@aphro:~]$ glxinfo > name of display: :0.0 > display: :0 screen: 0 > direct rendering: Yes > server glx vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation > server glx version string: 1.2 > [..] > OpenGL vendor string: NVIDIA Corporation > OpenGL renderer string: GeForce3/PCI/3DNOW! > OpenGL version string: 1.3.1 NVIDIA 28.80 > [..] > (bunch more stuff snipped) > > nate > > ----------------------------------------------------------------- > > Subject: Re: Unidentified subject! > Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2003 19:26:14 +0000 > From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > On Thu, Jan 02, 2003 at 12:56:25PM -0600, Jason Pepas wrote: > > I don't know what to file a bugreport against, checkinstall, man, > > groff or lp? > > > > (pts/3)jason@marsala:~$ zcat /usr/share/man/man1/checkinstall.1.gz | groff > > -mand > > What's -mand? Perhaps you mean -mandoc. > > > <standard input>:106: warning: `spec' not defined (probable missing space > > after > > What's on line 106 of that file? > > It looks like a broken man page to me. I can rule out man and lp from > your list above; it could be either checkinstall or groff at fault. > > -- > Colin Watson [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
