Hello, > There is the difficulty that Debian is an organization that is based on > volunteers, where RH is a registered company. So managements tend to see > RH as much more solid and stable organization then Debian. And that > imply, when extending this managements point of view, that RH products > are better then Debian.
By the same reasoning, of course, MS products are better than RH. After all, Debian has a long list of bugs on its homepage, while MS has no bugs at all. (What was that quote from Gates again? No essential bugs?) Jiri
