On Sat, Dec 19, 1998 at 11:25:07 -0700, Zooko wrote: > A company that i am working for insists that the software i'm writing has > to compile with g++ 2.8 (that's right, the "official", GNU one, _not_ > egcs).
The only visible FSF gcc development is that once in a while someone on the gnu.* groups claims it isn't dead. Have you tried explaining the current reality to them? > Is there a g++2.8 package hidden in some darkened corner, or am i going to > have to (ugh!) run "make bootstrap" all by myself? Once upon a long ago, I made FSF gcc 2.8.[01] packages for project/experimental. They have been removed now (as they weren't up to date to coexist with the regular gcc and EGCS packages, and could cause library problems). HTH, Ray -- Obsig: developing a new sig
