Hello, rick wrote: > chuck asked, > > > Me too! I'm usually a very cautious person...How do we *know* that this ... > There's enough in there contrary to the ms party line that it's quite > clear that it's confidential.
Just because it's confidential doesn't mean it wasn't leaked intentionally... Say with a view of getting some feedback on their analysis from us. Perhaps unlikely, but possible. Hmm, maybe the bit about FUD was specifically aimed at us? Jiri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
