George Bonser writes: > > Wow, why such complexities? Try VM under Emacs or (better) XEmacs. You > > I would say the learning curve for netscape mail is a lot different than > for emacs.
I agree. OTOH, the learning curve for Windows 95 is a lot different than for Linux. We're not supposed to be afraid of difficulties in the first stages! :-) > At least netscape installs cleanly every time I have tried it. > I did two fresh installs of Debian last month and emacs never installed > either time. When I installed hamm it installed flawlessly. What was your problem with the installation and why don't we solve it? > Besides, netscape is a lot smaller than emacs and company. I'm not sure that's true... alexsh:~> ps auwxm | egrep '(PID|netscape|emacs)' | grep -v grep PID TTY MAJFLT MINFLT TRS DRS SIZE SWAP RSS SHRD LIB DT COMMAND 197 ? 5603 62008 3140 7448 10736 148 10588 2900 0 1921 xemacs 673 ? 2298 3790 4620 12656 17276 0 17276 5644 0 2870 /usr/lib/netscape/netscape file:/home/alexsh/web/start.html And this is Netscape Navigator not Communicator, and XEmacs not Emacs. Or do you refer to the size on disk rather than memory? -- Alex Shnitman [EMAIL PROTECTED] UIN 188956 http://alexsh.home.ml.org -- PGP key here http://www.debian.org -- and the OS here
