On Mon, 21 Sep 1998, Adrian Bridgett wrote: > On Sun, Sep 20, 1998 at 11:39:48PM -0500, dsb3 wrote: > > [...] > > > > Unless my memory fails me, I've formatted a zip disk in ext2 complete with > > swap partition and installed linux. I did this at the beginning of the > > year when I had access to a zip drive - I still have the disk but alas > > don't have a drive so can't verify exactly whats on there... > > > > Anyway, the point of what I want to say is this. Why bother with ext2 on > > a zip disk. You're most likely going to use it to move files between > > computer 1 and computer 2. Possibly to take files from computer 1 and > > archive them offline someplace. Why do you need ext2? > > Long file names, permissions, its far faster (linux much prefers ext2 to any > other format). Besides, I like showing the limitations of windows machines > "I can read your disk but you can't read mine" - improved security I guess > :-)
Well thank goodness somebody sorted the low/high level formatting argument. I do use ext2 for my jaz disks, as I believe it's a more reliable filesystem, and that becomes increasingly important for large disks. But I don't bother with anything but FAT16 for floppies and zips (used through the parallel port). However, I get long filenames, permissions etc. How? Well everything is zipped up in zipfiles. (That's infozip zip, not iomega zip, of course.) The great advantage is that you can view or unzip any file on anybody's PC, particularly if you make sure there's a copy of unzip512.exe on every disk. Cheers, -- Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tel: +44 1908 653 739 Fax: +44 1908 655 151 Snail: David Wright, Earth Science Dept., Milton Keynes, England, MK7 6AA Disclaimer: These addresses are only for reaching me, and do not signify official stationery. Views expressed here are either my own or plagiarised.
