"Clive" == Clive Standbridge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Clive> On Mon 16 Dec 2002 19:40:11 +0000(-0600), Shyamal Prasad
Clive> wrote:
>> Thanks for all the clues. The truth is I do not run
>> spamassassin on messages that are from a Debian list since the
>> mailing list server runs it anyway. I guess those servers run
>> stable ;-)
Clive> I don't run spamassassin either, yet my copy of the
Clive> announcement contained
>> X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.8 required=4.0
>> tests=EXCUSE_3,SPAM_PHRASE_01_02,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
>> version=2.43 X-Spam-Level:
Clive> Shouldn't we have received the same text? I assume we're
Clive> looking at the same message i.e.
>> To: Debian Announcements <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> Subject: Debian GNU/Linux 3.0 updated (r1) Message-ID:
>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Well, I get debian-announce at work and those headers match what you
quote above. But at home I'm not subscribed to debian-announce, so
perhaps I got it off debian-user. I'm pretty sure I don't run
spamassassin on the debian messages, but I'm going to have a good look
at my .procmailrc (AFAIK I'm pulling filtering all marked spam and
debian messages off in my .procmailrc and then running spamassassin on
everything else).
I guess I've got something messed up, I can't quite believe that one
debian list runs a different version of spamassassin than another
list.....
Cheers!
Shyamal
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
